On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Translations between different nonmonotonic formalisms always have been an important topic in the field, in particular to understand the knowledgerepresentation capabilities those formalisms offer. We provide such an investigation in terms of different semantics proposed for abstract argumentation frameworks, a nonmonotonic yet simple formalism which received increasing interest within the last decade. Although the properties of these different semantics are nowadays well understood, there are no explicit results about intertranslatability. We provide such translations wrt. different properties and also give a few novel complexity results which underlie some negative results.
منابع مشابه
Intertranslatability of Labeling-Based Argumentation Semantics
Abstract Argumentation is a simple yet powerful formalism for modeling the human reasoning and argumentation process. Various semantics have been suggested with a view of arriving at coherent outcomes of the argumentation process. Two categories of semantics are well-known, extension-based semantics and labeling-based semantics. Translations between semantics are an important area of interest t...
متن کاملComparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics1
In this work we complement recent investigations of the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics. Our focus is on the expressiveness of argumentation semantics and thus we expand the area of interest beyond efficiently computable translations. To this end we provide new translations between semantics as well as new translational impossibility results. This allows us to draw a hierarchy f...
متن کاملResolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited
The resolution-based grounded semantics constitutes one of the most interesting approaches for the evaluation of abstract argumentation frameworks. This particular semantics satisfies a large number of desired properties, among them all properties proposed by Baroni and Giacomin. In recent years, the analysis of argumentation semantics has been extended by further topics, among them characteriz...
متن کاملComparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics
Understanding the expressiveness of a formalism is undoubtedly an important part of understanding its possibilities and limitations. Translations between different formalisms have proven to be valuable tools for understanding this very expressiveness. In this work we complement recent investigations of the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics for Dung’s abstract argumentation framewo...
متن کاملComputational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation
This work is in the context of formal argumentation, a sub-field of Artificial Intelligence. Probably the most popular formalism in argumentation is abstract argumentation as introduced by Dung [42]. So called abstract argumentation frameworks abstract from the actual content of arguments and represent them as abstract entities and further abstract from the reasons of conflicts between argument...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Artif. Intell. Res.
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011